THE
term 'orchid grower' encompasses a very wide
range of personalities with a great variation in degree of enthusiasm. For
example; there are the avid exhibitors who put all of
their effort into winning prizes at shows; there are
commercial types who love orchids but are interested
mainly in how much money they can make with them, the casual
hobbyist who just likes to have a few orchids or the keen amateur who is on the way
to becoming one of the above
three.
There
are other classes too and, no matter what
heading fits you; knowledge of orchid
judging and awards is essential to the
greater enjoyment of the
hobby.
Orchid awards are
given in recognition of outstanding improvement in any section
of the Orchidaceae,
towards the theoretical ideal. They can also be given
for outstanding merit in some particular characteristic of
any orchid or they can be given to a grower for a
particularly good effort in growing a
plant.
In
the first section, orchid blooms are
allotted points for the
excellence of their properties, including shape, colour &
texture, substance, habit of spike and in the case of
'spray' orchids, their floriferousness. The total of possible
points for all awards is
100. Three awards are available as follows: 75 to less than 80 points
qualifies for a Highly Commended Certificate
(HCC); 80 to less than 85 points qualifies for an
Award of Merit (AM) and 85 points and greater qualifies
for a First Class Certificate
(FCC).
A
bloom may qualify for an Award of Distinction
(AD) if not having the overall perfection to qualify
for one of the above three awards it has an extremely outstanding
attribute such as intensity of colour. This award may
be granted in conjunction with the above
awards.
Three
cultural certificates are available: these are
applicable to plants which have been exceptionally well grown,
showing evidence of culture above the ordinary. The
plant needs to be flowering freely, preferably better than its
normal type, and the
condition of flowers, pseudobulbs and foliage must be excellent,
taking into account the hybrid or species being shown
and its natural characteristics. The Award of
Cultural
Commendation
(ACC) is given for plants receiving 75
to less than 80 points, the Award of Cultural Merit (ACM) for plants
receiving 80 to less than 85 points, and the Award of
Cultural Excellent- (ACE) for plants receiving 85 point
or more.
A Certificate of
Botanical Merit (CBM) is granted, once only, to any species
orchid which is new and/or
rare in cultivation in Australia and which has been
cultivated well and is a good example of its type. The
award is used as a bench-mark for future awards of this
species. No allocation of points is
made.
Hybridisers are
encouraged by the Award of Special Recognition (ACR); an award
granted to a person for the advancement of a particular line
of breeding, in hybrid development or in line-breeding of species orchids. A
minimum of twelve plants of the development being
assessed are required to be shown at the same time. Flowers
need not be of award quality, but must be of consistently high
standard. A statement from
the hybridises is required, which outlines the
strategies (parents, timeframe etc.) used in the production of
the submitted plants.
Reasons
for
Awards
Awards are a very
necessary feature of orchidology. The original purpose
for them was, as has been stated, to give recognition to an
outstanding flower. This purpose, of course, is the same today
and we find that through such events as the World Orchid
Conference, orchid awards throughout the world are becoming
standardized. Therefore awards help orchid buyers and a
person in England can quite confidently purchase a division of
an awarded plant from Australia knowing that the flower will
be up to a particular standard.
Of
course, awards are the goal sought after by the orchid
hybridiser and these people are continually striving, through
research, to produce better and more consistent
crossings.
This continual
advancement in orchid hybridization means that orchid judges
also must advance their ideas of plant 'perfection'. It can,
therefore, be seen that orchid judges must have a considerable
experience in orchidology and are continually increasing their
knowledge in this field to keep up with
current breeding trends.
It is obvious that
the awards standards must also progress. For example, an
orchid bloom which received and award ten years ago
might be hard-pressed to achieve an equivalent award today.
For this reason it is important that all award citations
should be followed by the year in which the plant was granted the award in
catalogues, lists and labels - e.g. Cymbidium
Wallara 'Wondabah' AM/AOC
(1964).
Awards are not,
and cannot, be distributed indiscriminately. Compared with the
many thousands of new plants which are introduced into
cultivation here each year, few awards are granted in
Australia. Therefore it can be seen that a bloom must be
outstanding to achieve this
distinction.
In summary, orchid
awards encourage growers to greater efforts and
provide a goal to aim for, they provide a standard of
values throughout the orchid world and they are an
incentive which makes the hybridise use all means at
their disposal to strive for better
things.
Through the
Australian Orchid Council we have a judging system that has
evolved; orchids gaining
awards in the past are used as benchmarks for the
present and through the use of these a continuum has
developed. As a result of the establishment of the AOC
Judging & Awards Standing Committee, comprising the
registrars of each region, we find that, throughout the
country, judging is standardized and all states have a
voice in awarding orchids for their degree of
excellence.
Colin
Jennings, AOC
Registrar General of Judging